Es reprochable que Friedman haya ayudado a Pinochet?
Excelente artículo en Reason sobre el tema:
But that was the extent of his involvement with the Chilean regime—and it fit with a recurring pattern in Friedman’s career of advising with an even hand all who would listen to him. It was not a sign of approval of military authoritarianism. Friedman, in defending himself against accusations of complicity with or approval of Pinochet, noted in a 1975 letter to the University of Chicago school newspaper that he “has never heard complaints” about giving aid and comfort to the communist governments to which he had spoken, and that “I approve of none of these authoritarian regimes—neither the Communist regimes of Russia and Yugoslavia nor the military juntas of Chile and Brazil. But I believe I can learn from observing them and that, insofar as my personal analysis of their economic situation enables them to improve their economic performance, that is likely to promote not retard a movement toward greater liberalism and freedom.”
If you believe it is a moral duty to boycott government criminals without reservation, then Friedman did the wrong thing in talking to Pinochet and writing him a letter. But if any Chilean had a better life because of any free-market reform that Friedman or Chicago-trained Pinochet advisors helped push through, that’s a small price to pay for any damage to Friedman’s reputation.
Virginia Postrel tiene un post sobre el tema.
Vamos a ver si entiendo bien. Si alguien colabora con un dictador de derecha se trata de una actitud censurable, pero si lo hace con uno de izquierda se trata de una persona de enorme sensibilidad social. ¿Es así?
ReplyDeleteNo hay que perder el tiempo discutiendo cosas de este tipo con los bolches (como decíamos antes).
ReplyDeleteYo creo que en su "heart of hearts" el zurdaje odia más a Friedman que a Pinochet.