Aug 4, 2007

Pelotudismo ambiental


Les juro que todavía me estoy riendo. No se puede creer. Resulta que ir de compras caminando es más perjudicial para el medioambiente que ir en auto. Y lo dice un "green", debe ser verdad.

¡Fuerte ese aplauso!:

Walking does more than driving to cause global warming, a leading environmentalist has calculated.

Food production is now so energy-intensive that more carbon is emitted providing a person with enough calories to walk to the shops than a car would emit over the same distance. The climate could benefit if people avoided exercise, ate less and became couch potatoes. Provided, of course, they remembered to switch off the TV rather than leaving it on standby.

The sums were done by Chris Goodall, campaigning author of How to Live a Low-Carbon Life, based on the greenhouse gases created by intensive beef production. “Driving a typical UK car for 3 miles [4.8km] adds about 0.9 kg [2lb] of CO2 to the atmosphere,” he said, a calculation based on the Government’s official fuel emission figures. “If you walked instead, it would use about 180 calories. You’d need about 100g of beef to replace those calories, resulting in 3.6kg of emissions, or four times as much as driving.

“The troubling fact is that taking a lot of exercise and then eating a bit more food is not good for the global atmosphere. Eating less and driving to save energy would be better.”

Mr Goodall, Green Party parliamentary candidate for Oxford West & Abingdon, is the latest serious thinker to turn popular myths about the environment on their head.

1 comment:

  1. Che, somos el país que más carne come del mundo... Espero que en la próxima cumbre no nos impongan una cuota máxima de consumo de vacuno. Lo mejor sería que Bono y compañía se ponga a hacer comapaña contra la carne, la gilada no coma más carne y tenemos el lomo a diez pesos de nuevo...
    Soñar no cuesta nada no?

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.