Mar 21, 2008

Me gustó esto

Del Ayn Rand Institute, visto en lo de Klausbert. Parecen cosas obvias, pero en la Argentina de la Dignidad y la Redistribución por la Justicia Social, hay mucha gente a quien esto no le entra en la cabeza.

The right to life, e.g., does not mean that your neighbors have to feed and clothe you; it means you have the right to earn your food and clothes yourself, if necessary by a hard struggle, and that no one can forcibly stop your struggle for these things or steal them from you if and when you have achieved them. In other words: you have the right to act, and to keep the results of your actions, the products you make, to keep them or to trade them with others, if you wish. But you have no right to the actions or products of others, except on terms to which they voluntarily agree.

To take one more example: the right to the pursuit of happiness is precisely that: the right to the pursuit to a certain type of action on your part and its result... not to any guarantee that other people will make you happy or even try to do so. Otherwise, there would be no liberty in the country: if your mere desire for something, anything, imposes a duty on other people to satisfy you, then they have no choice in their lives, no say in what they do, they have no liberty, they cannot pursue their happiness. Your "right" to happiness at their expense means that they become rightless serfs, i.e., your slaves. Your right to anything at others' expense means that they become rightless.

1 comment:

  1. Ese es exactamente el punto, hay mucha gente que está convencida de que el estado debe garantizar los resultados.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.