Jun 27, 2010

¿Se estarán dando cuenta?

¿Por lo menos por ahora, de que el keynesianismo es un verso, de que nunca funcionó y de que no va a funcionar ahora, sencillamente porque la magia no existe?

Espero que sí y que vuelva algo de racionalidad al manejo de la cosa pública:

The larger lesson here is about policy. The original sin—and it was nearly global—was to revive the Keynesian economic model that had last cracked up in the 1970s, while forgetting the lessons of the long prosperity from 1982 through 2007. The Reagan and Clinton-Gingrich booms were fostered by a policy environment for most of that era of lower taxes, spending restraint and sound money. The spending restraint began to end in the late 1990s, sound money vanished earlier this decade, and now Democrats are promising a series of enormous tax increases.

---

President Obama's tragic mistake was to blow out the U.S. federal balance sheet on spending that has produced little bang for the buck. The fantastical Keynesian notion (the "multiplier") that $1 of spending produces $1.50 in growth was long ago demolished by Harvard's Robert Barro, among others. That $1 in spending has to come from somewhere, which means in taxes or borrowing from productive parts of the private economy. Given that so much of the U.S. stimulus went for transfer payments such as Medicaid and unemployment insurance, the "multiplier" has almost certainly been negative.


(Gracias, Dolores)

1 comment:

  1. Si todavía quedan stalinistas o maoístas, hay keynesianos para rato....

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.