¿No se hablaba de una idea similar en los malditos 90, cuando estábamos mal y no teníamos dignidad?
For the Falklands, the governments of the United Kingdom and Argentina would agree that those Falklanders who were qualified to vote would be allowed to do so in a referendum. The referendum would allow the settlers – who are English-speaking and English by custom, institutions and loyalties – to vote on whether they prefer the status quo, or whether they would agree (“yes”) to an Argentine takeover. A super-majority “yes” vote, of say 80 per cent, would be required by the Falklanders to allow Argentina to claim sovereignty.
This is where markets come in. The Falklanders would have to be compensated by Argentina for accepting its claim to sovereignty. The referendum would be designed so that Argentina could offer a cash incentive. Before the referendum, Argentina would deposit an amount (let’s say $500,000) in escrow in Swiss bank accounts for every man, woman and child who had proven their Falklands residence prior to the referendum.
If the referendum went in Argentina’s favour (over 80 per cent of eligible voters casting a “yes” vote), then the funds in escrow would be transferred and Argentina’s unambiguous sovereignty over the Falklands would be established. Argentina’s cost, in this hypothetical, would be about $1.6bn.
Sí, es una posibilidad, yo había pensado 1 palito verde per cápita. Y sí, en épocas del Carlo se había pensado en eso.
ReplyDeleteYo paso, no tengo interés en que mis impuestos vayan a comprar una roca.
ReplyDelete¿Por qué no me dan los 500 a mi? ¿O acaso cuando empiecen a recaudar con los derechos de pesca o de exploración me van a devolver los impuestos que pagué para comprarla?
Turros.