Sep 12, 2010

Business vs. Charity

Flor de editorial hoy en el WSJ, visto en lo del TaxProf. Cosas que se caen de maduras, y aún así hay que seguir explicandolas.

Bill Gates and Warren Buffett announced this month that 40 of America's richest people have agreed to sign a "Giving Pledge" to donate at least half of their wealth to charity. With a collective net worth said to total $230 billion, that promise translates to at least $115 billion.

It's an impressive number. Yet some—including Messrs. Gates and Buffett—say it isn't enough. Perhaps it's actually too much:
the wealthy may help humanity more as businessmen and women than as philanthropists.

What are the chances, after all, that the two forces behind the Giving Pledge will contribute anywhere near as much to the betterment of society through their charity as they have through their business pursuits? In building Microsoft, Bill Gates changed the way the world creates and shares knowledge. Warren Buffett's investments have birthed and grown innumerable profitable enterprises, making capital markets work more efficiently and enriching many in the process. ...


Leanlo que es cortito.

4 comments:

  1. Está muy claro. Muy oportuno para mi por una trifulca interna que tengo por ese asunto de la RSE. De todas maneras hay que reconocer que en el corto plazo no hay nada mas eficaz que una ayuda directa.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Pero por supuesto, para los colectivistas transferir riqueza es más beneficioso que generarla. Sencillamente porque todo el mundo sabe que la riqueza no se genera.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mientras leía la nota me empezó a dar vueltas por la cabeza esta canción:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkRIbUT6u7Q

    (de la sección "películas que no dan nunca por televisión")

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.