Mas de Rothbard (el original, no nuestro co-blogger). Discrepo en algunos puntos pero es bien interesante para meditar. Viene de acá.
A RIGHT-WING POPULIST PROGRAM
A right-wing populist program, then, must concentrate on dismantling the crucial existing areas of State and elite rule, and on liberating the average American from the most flagrant and oppressive features of that rule. In short:
l. Slash Taxes. All taxes, sales, business, property, etc., but especially the most oppressive politically and personally: the income tax. We must work toward repeal of the income tax and abolition of the IRS.
2. Slash Welfare. Get rid of underclass rule by abolishing the welfare system, or, short of abolition, severely cutting and restricting it.
3. Abolish Racial or Group Privileges. Abolish affirmative action, set aside racial quotas, etc., and point out that the root of such quotas is the entire "civil rights" structure, which tramples on the property rights of every American.
4. Take Back the Streets: Crush Criminals. And by this I mean, of course, not "white collar criminals" or "inside traders" but violent street criminals – robbers, muggers, rapists, murderers. Cops must be unleashed, and allowed to administer instant punishment, subject of course to liability when they are in error.
5. Take Back the Streets: Get Rid of the Bums. Again: unleash the cops to clear the streets of bums and vagrants. Where will they go? Who cares? Hopefully, they will disappear, that is, move from the ranks of the petted and cosseted bum class to the ranks of the productive members of society.
6. Abolish the Fed; Attack the Banksters. Money and banking are recondite issues. But the realities can be made vivid: the Fed is an organized cartel of banksters, who are creating inflation, ripping off the public, destroying the savings of the average American. The hundreds of billions of taxpayer handouts to S&L banksters will be chicken-feed compared to the coming collapse of the commercial banks.
7. America First. A key point, and not meant to be seventh in priority. The American economy is not only in recession; it is stagnating. The average family is worse off now than it was two decades ago. Come home America. Stop supporting bums abroad. Stop all foreign aid, which is aid to banksters and their bonds and their export industries. Stop gloabaloney, and let's solve our problems at home.
8. Defend Family Values. Which means, get the State out of the family, and replace State control with parental control. In the long run, this means ending public schools, and replacing them with private schools. But we must realize that voucher and even tax credit schemes are not, despite Milton Friedman, transitional demands on the path to privatized education; instead, they will make matters worse by fastening government control more totally upon the private schools. Within the sound alternative is decentralization, and back to local, community neighborhood control of the schools.
Further: We must reject once and for all the left-libertarian view that all government-operated resources must be cesspools. We must try, short of ultimate privatization, to operate government facilities in a manner most conducive to a business, or to neighborhood control. But that means: that the public schools must allow prayer, and we must abandon the absurd left-atheist interpretation of the First Amendment that "establishment of religion" means not allowing prayer in public schools, or a creche in a schoolyard or a public square at Christmas. We must return to common sense, and original intent, in constitutional interpretation.
So far: every one of these right-wing populist programs is totally consistent with a hard-core libertarian position. But all real-world politics is coalition politics, and there are other areas where libertarians might well compromise with their paleo or traditionalist or other partners in a populist coalition. For example, on family values, take such vexed problems as pornography, prostitution, or abortion. Here, pro-legalization and pro-choice libertarians should be willing to compromise on a decentralist stance; that is, to end the tyranny of the federal courts, and to leave these problems up to states and better yet, localities and neighborhoods, that is, to "community standards."
-- "Right-Wing Populism", 1992
No entiendo por qué lo llama un programa para un “populismo de derecha”. Me parece que en todo caso se trata más de un programa “popular de derecha”. “Popular” y “populismo” no son sinónimos.
ReplyDeleteSi, concuerdo, lo leí dos veces, la segunda no lo entendí.
ReplyDeleteMe parece que usa "populismo" para decir que hay que convencer a las masas y salir a las calles, a diferencia de Hayek, que se quedaba en su torre de marfil con los otros intelectuales.
Muy facho.
ReplyDeleteEl parrafo de dejar rezar en los colegios me parece cut & paste de algun religious nutjob. Con el resto estoy de acuerdo en casi todo. (El ultimo tambien me parece medio choto, al final no es tan anarco-capitalista como si conservador).
ReplyDeleteMe borraron mi comment que había hecho en el otro post!!
ReplyDelete"Agarraste al Rothbard en su etapa mas derechosa, que se aliaba con Pat Buchanan, y se hacía llamar paleo-libertarian, prefiero al Rothbard que se consideraba heredero de la Old Right, y al Rothbard que intentaba estrechar lazos, de manera infructuosa, con la New Left.
Por suerte, antes de dejarnos, reconoció que Buchanan no era ningún aliado para la libertad."
Jonah, no borré nada. Dejame ver.
ReplyDeleteEl paraíso, ni más ni menos.
ReplyDelete